« Keep your eye on the doughnut, not the hole | Main | Legal advice »
29 September 2006
Separated at birth?
There's a remarkable diary today on DKos that describes an encounter with a cabbie who emigrated from Idi Amin's Uganda. Twenty-four years ago he fled dictatorship and oppression to find freedom in Canada. Bale, the cabbie, has the wisdom of someone who's seen it all (all emphasis mine):
"How did he [Amin] get so powerful?"
"Well he was already powerful. But he rose to power by dividing people. You know he been with Kings African Rifles, and old British regiment. He learned military stuff really well and so when he was living somewhere and he was angry with someone, he would get ten guys from a competing tribe to go get him. You understand?"
"What do you mean competing?"
"I mean they hate each other since before time. The Zulus and the Hutus...you know these?"
"In Rwanda? Yes. [...] They hate each other since before a single white man put a foot in Africa. Amin recruited armies of Lugbaras to kill Acholis. He was good at that. And he was a big man. Very strong. Very intimidating. He had an army of thugs. Very soon, he used them."
"I could not understand how my friends who I grew up with, even my brother, would start agreeing with his thugs and his policies. I could not believe my brother who said one evening to me "What do you care about the Acholies?"
" `Your mother is Acholie', I told my brother."
"So? That means I should want more Acholies in my neighborhood? They stink. Mom is different."
"I was so upset. How could my brother act like this? Because he was afraid and [d]id not want to be on the side of the weak."
[...]
"What do you think about Bush?"
"Bush is a dictator. Did I offend you?"
"No. What makes him a dictator?"
"You cannot joke about killing him. Hell even under Amin we danced and sang death songs at him. He had a hotel complex that he tortured people in. The difference between Bush and Amin as far as that goes is that I knew where my relatives were being tortured, and no one knows exactly where the Americans are torturing their victims."
"Do you believe we are doing horrible torture to thousands or to a few?"
He thought about it and said "Is there any difference? My experience is that once torturers begin torturing, the torturers have a hard time stopping."
That really upset me. I persisted. "Seriously, do you think we are torturing thousands?"
He took his time. "They won't let you see one dead soldier. Even under a flag they won't let you see it. They don't tell you the truth about anything. They lie lie lie. My experience tells me this. I don't really know. But if I had to guess, I would guess that your government is doing the worst things you can possibly imagine. Liars are lying because they cannot tell the truth. When I see Bush speak, I don't see a stupid man as you do and many others. I see a man who is too shamed to tell the truth. He has caused so much pain and knows it, but if he admitted one little bit of it, it would come crashing out like a dam. You understand? Bush is in a lot of pain."
We pulled up to the hotel, I asked him to park and waved off the bellhop.
"What do you think will happen to America, Bale?"
"What do you mean WILL happen? What hasn't happened yet? You torture in secret. You invade for what? The government reads your e-mail and listens to your telephone and makes you take off your shoes and pull out your computer. For what? Who do you need to protect yourself against? Is your computer going to attack you? Who should you be afraid of? Your government is more scary to most people than any terrorist. I feel for you really. Because I don't think you have any idea how far down the road you already are."
"So you think we are already at a dictatorship," I asked.
"I think you are far worse than a dictatorship. You are in a dictatorship but most of the population is still living in another time. Once America was the cat's meow. The problem isn't so much your government. It is your population. Here you are have lost so much in freedom, so much in prosperity and so much in reputation, and you have to ask me if you are living under a dictatorship," He answered a call for a pick- up. "I will have to leave. There is a passenger across the street. But I will leave you with this. Dictatorship looks different to everyone. Some of them are disguised and people can't see past the disguise. In China, it was years before anyone questioned why they all wore the same close [sic]. In America, if you are rich or conservative, dictatorship can be very pleasant. You understand?"
"I understand," I paid him, and thanked him.
"Do you think I should flee America?" I asked him.
"I fled mine," he answered.
We can't all flee. We've got to stay and see this through. We've got to start the rollback away from dictatorship and begin our redemption from national shame. But first we've got to see and understand exactly where we are and what we've become.
Bale put his finger directly on the dynamic that draws voters to the Republicans:
"Because he was afraid and did not want to be on the side of the weak."
Republican success for the past thirty-eight years has been achieved by both sowing fear and appearing strong.
But we all know that they're not really strong. Republicans are as weak and frightened as the people who vote for them.
This is what we've been trying to tell Democrats like the Torture Twelve: Go along, you lose. Stand up to the brutes, you win.
Rove is famous for attacking his opponents precisely where they seem strongest. It gives his guy the appearance of strength.
I say attack Republicans precisely where they appear strongest: Their perceived strength itself.
Every Republican running for reelection is weak, a cowering pussy who can't and won't stand up to Bush and Cheney.
Bush and Cheney are weak. If they were strong, they wouldn't need to make everyone else afraid. They wouldn't need to lie and bluster. They wouldn't need to torture.
They have power because they have divided Americans. But power isn't strength. Republicans are weak, frightened bullies who can't stand the light of day. They don't want us to know what they're doing in our name, because they know we'll kick their sorry asses to hell and back.
It's our job to repeat that every day, to ourselves and to everybody who crosses our path.
Posted by Chiaroscuro _ on September 29, 2006 at 02:20 PM in Blog Watch, Moral Values, Scoundrel Time, True Blue v. Red Menace | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451648869e200d834ecc0b269e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Separated at birth?:
Comments
Of everything chilling in the post on Kos, this quote I found most chilling of all:
"The problem isn't so much your government. It is your population."
Posted by: Ellen Dana Nagler | Sep 29, 2006 4:45:20 PM
I see now that you put the same quote in bold. (I went over to Kos before I finished reading your post -- sorry.) And I think you have a winner with: "But power isn't strength."
Posted by: Ellen Dana Nagler | Sep 29, 2006 4:47:54 PM
I agree, the problem is the population. People don't want to educate themseleves about what's going on, it's "just politics", and they don't believe that affects their lives. After all, there's still Starbucks and lots of shopping to do, so everything's fine, huh?
Americans are fat and happy, and basically don't care what happens in their government. They don't make the connection to how it affects them. They'll stand like sheeple to be searched at the airport, happily give their personal info at the checkout stands, listen to Rush on the radio and O Reilly on the TV and feel all big and powerful because somebody spews lies that make them feel important and better than someone else.
That's what we've become. It's sad. The only people I can really talk to anymore are the ones online, like you people. We're the only ones left who care. Even when I start in with my husband, he just says, "Yeah, I know, I agree with you, but what can we do?" He goes out and buys a gun to shoot and think that makes him all big and powerful and that makes it ok. But won't get involved politically, won't say what he feels or thinks to people. It makes me sad and angry.
We talk more seriously now about moving to Canada or whatever, but I really worry for those who won't have options. One of our gay friends announced th eother day he and his partner are moving to Sweden. I hope those who are more likely targets of these people than I am will be able to move, but I fear more for those who buy into the crap and sign on to it. How will they feel when they wake up? When they realize what they supported?
Posted by: donna | Oct 1, 2006 11:58:53 AM
I try to tell myself that the vast majority of Americans haven't drunk the Kool Aid, they're just not paying attention. That in itself is bad, but can be remedied.
I believe most Americans are basically good-hearted and want to do the right thing. Determining the right course takes two things: a sense of security and enough information to know and understand what's going on.
As a nation, we're being buffeted by accelerating changes in the workplace that are part of our headlong plunge into the new serfdom (aka "globalization"). Step by step, the middle class has been squeezed to the point of real pain and fear.
I truly believe the loss of economic security has been sublimated and transformed by Bush as part of his campaign of fear-mongering against the "other" or the terrorists. People were primed to get hysterical after 9/11 and start the witch hunts because they were already nervous and afraid.
The blogs are the only places where any of this is being discussed and debated. Digby has a post up that refers to a terrific piece in the Boston Review by Henry Farrell of Crooked Timber. It's a must-read look at the role of blogging in American political discourse.
The problem is that media, diversion and crowded lifestyles hog our time and thoughts. Who really talks seriously with their neighbors and coworkers about politics? Those of us who are passionate about politics go online. We know we've been let down by the media, but the person who gets his news from television or tabloids can barely begin to understand how much he's been shortchanged.
When things get bad enough, though, the average person will take notice. It's been happening gradually. Certainly things are getting bad. I only hope it's not too little, too late.
That's why a strong Democratic party and leadership that talks about all these things in plain language is needed so badly. If someone like your husband could see he's not alone, that there are people who are ready to lead us out of this dark wood, he might not be so ready to rely on an arsenal and silence.
Posted by: Chiaroscuro | Oct 1, 2006 4:06:39 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.









